Showing posts with label Property. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Property. Show all posts

Friday, June 10, 2016

Civil Asset Forfeiture Moves to the Mainstream

Rights? Who needs rights???
Now, the Oklahoma Highway Patrol has a device that also allows them to seize money on prepaid cards.

It's called an ERAD, or Electronic Recovery and Access to Data machine, and OHP began using 16 of them last month.

Here's how it works. If a trooper suspects a person may have money tied to some type of crime, the highway patrol can scan and seize money from prepaid cards. OHP stresses troopers do not do this during all traffic stops, only situations where they believe there is probable cause.

"We're gonna look for different factors in the way that you're acting,” Oklahoma Highway Patrol Lt. John Vincent said. “We're gonna look for if there's a difference in your story. If there's someway that we can prove that you're falsifying information to us about your business."

Checkpoints come in various forms, some hard and some soft. Note the Lieutenant's take on this -
"We're gonna look for different factors in the way that you're acting,”

Now contrast this with the law of the land, the 4th amendment -
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
Note how not only there needs to be probable cause, not belief of probable cause. But hey, who cares, it's an old law right?

Now, you're supposed to rest assured it's not about the money -
"I know that a lot of people are just going to focus on the seizing money. That's a very small thing that' s happening now. The largest part that we have found ... the biggest benefit has been the identity theft," Vincent said.

"If you can prove can prove that you have a legitimate reason to have that money it will be given back to you. And we've done that in the past," Vincent said about any money seized.
At least they're reassuring you it's 'only a very small thing' -
It shows the state is paying ERAD Group Inc., $5,000 for the software and scanners, then 7.7 percent of all the cash forfeited through the courts to the highway patrol.

Monday, March 18, 2013

Highway Robbery - Cyprus Style

The banksters strike with lethal precision -

Cyprus will put forward a new proposal on Monday under which a tax-free threshold or a lower tax rate for smaller depositors could be introduced, media reports said on Monday, in a move aimed at easing the pain of a bailout agreement which will impose an unprecedented tax on savers.

Banks in the country were shut on Monday for a public holiday, and would remain shut on Tuesday and Wednesday, the agencies said. The news comes amid fears that the decision to force uninsured depositors to fund part of the country's bailout could many prompt savers to withdraw their holdings.


Got that? No? Let me spell it out:
  • "tax rate for smaller depositors" Theft of individual private property entrusted to a private institution (bank) for safe keeping.
  • "unprecedented" The overt nature of the confiscation is the only unprecedented bit about this.
  • "Banks in the country were shut on Monday" This was timed to give them the longest window possible to get this done
  • "...and would remain shut on Tuesday and Wednesday..." And the government is forcing the people to keep their money with the banks. (After all, a "bank run" is nothing more than private consumers voting 'no confidence' with their money.)
  •  "...a bailout agreement" The primary beneficiaries are the very institutions which are keeping this money in the first place. They screwed up and they want the government to provide cover while they raid other accounts!
 Let's continue...
Reuters cited a government source in Cyprus as saying that the country is mulling a tax-free threshold on the bank deposit levy for smaller deposits. It cited a parliamentary official as suggesting that deposits up to 20,000 euros could be exempt. Remaining deposits up to 100,000 euros would be taxed at 6.7 percent and those exceeding that amount at 9.9 percent, the official told the news agency on condition of anonymity.

Earlier Dow Jones cited two unnamed European officials as saying savers with 100,000 to 500,000 euros would face a 10 percent tax, while those with savings over 500,000 euros would be taxed at 15 percent. Those with savings up to 100,000 euros would be taxed at 3 percent, according the report.

Under the original plan, every depositor under 100,000 euros would be taxed at 6.75 percent and those over that amount would face a 9.9 percent tax. The Cypriot Parliament has delayed a vote on the plan to Tuesday, an EU official told Reuters, "to allow time for more negotiations".


Ooops...we risked upsetting too many at the same time, so let's just 'target the rich...'
European Central Bank board member Joerg Asmussen told reporters on the sidelines of a conference on Monday that it was for the Cypriot government to decide the structure of a levy on depositors, Reuters reported, but the overall volume of its contribution to the bailout had to amount to 5.8 billion euros.

The German and French governments were also open to changing the bailout deal for Cyprus, Reuters said.


A EU bank head told Cyprus that they had to fork over 5.8 billion euros at the behest of the Germans and French, how they choose to screw their populace is up to them.
In order to achieve debt sustainability, a contribution from Cyprus is necessary, a contribution from the banking sector, from depositors and owners," Steffen Seibert, a spokesman for Chancellor Angela Merkels told the agency.

"How the country arrives at this contribution, how it divides it up, was and is up to the Cypriot government," he added. "As I believe the finance minister said last night on television, Germany could have imagined a different solution, a different staggering. But it was not our decision."
'We didn't tell them to do it exactly that way, so it wasn't us..."

Whether or not this passes is to an extent irrelevant. What is far more important is that this indicates a shift in bankster thinking away from subversive confiscation via inflation/gimmicking present over the last 30 years towards outright confiscation. Naturally, they are still trying to be coy about the whole thing by labeling it a tax on depositors, hoping they can get the cash on the helicopter before the populace realizes they've been had.


Here's the  Real Effect review. Note that all of these statements generally took place before the problems were reported in the first place, much less publicly recognized.

Oct 4, 2005 - Start of the US housing downturn phase
I believe that this will spread in this country gradually at first, but as the pinch of natural gas prices (40% higher in Wisconsin) combined with still increasing gasoline prices begin to strip Americans free cash, we will begin to see many people selling off properties in an attempt to capitalize on unrealistically high housing prices. After all, if you can't afford to heat one house, can you afford to heat two?

I strongly believe this will lead to a panicked sell-a-thon which will flood the market with overpriced housing, driving the prices down to at least pre-bubble levels. This will leave many holding large outstanding debts as much of their investment's value plummets.
Sept 17, 2008 - Start of the global correction
The long and short is they are bleeding the real assets out of the United States and passing them into foreign control. Make no mistake, they will bleed this country dry. Savings, checking, 401K, gold, assets, they want it all and will not stop until they get it. The only companies that survive will be those that primarily serve the industrial military complex. Overnight this country will be transformed into the new prison state for the Global Order. Get food, get water, get a gun and get ready to defend yourself.
 Jun 15, 2009 - Start of "Green Shoots"
This is not a recession, it is a depression. And a massive one at that. We are not at the bottom, we are on gaining momentum for the next plunge down. If you thought the last drop was bad, this one is going to strike fear into the hearts of men everywhere. The Dow will push through the last market low of 7,392.27, then 6000 and after that 3000. As capitol assets are ravished, what you will be seeing is the consumption of the golden goose in a proverbial feasting on the rotting carcass of the American consumer. 
  May 20, 2010 -
Here is the crux of the problem though. The globalists understood that the sheep would wake up, in fact they anticipated and planned for it by naming it the IMF riot. The relevant question is, who can outflank who here? Will the people get to the globalists before they are able to pull the trigger on the full police state?

Look for capital to fly from asset to asset, looking for a safe harbor, yet there is very few left to be found.
Jan 28, 2011 - Start of the "Arab Spring"
Look for continued unrest with some governments getting overthrown. But as I indicated earlier, the globalists are literally banking on this to occur. We are still not there yet though. More riots need to take place, some shots, some new faces and then, we go to war.

Oct 15, 2012 - Start of the "Civil War phase"
Got that? He's admitting Ordo Ab Chao (Look it up) in the US in order to merge us into an international system. This is the destabilization phase of the longer reaching Religious War (Series) that is being used to demonize religion. Look for a continuing resurgence in class warfare which first seeks to commit countries to civil war before turning their sights across the world to 'the other nations who did this to us!'

Monday, January 07, 2013

Cities Collapsing Around America

The records begin catching up with the predictions -

In East St. Louis -
East St. Louis has a national reputation for being a city that you want to avoid. The following is from a recent Bloomberg article about the growing crime in that community...
Dodging open manholes where thieves had swiped cast-iron covers, Stephen Wigginton drives the crumbling streets of his hometown, East St. Louis, Illinois, pointing out new landmarks in America’s most violent city.

There’s the shopping mall where a police officer was shot in the face, a youth center that saw a triple homicide in September, and scattered about the city of 27,000 are brightly lit gas stations that serve as magnets for carjackers, hit-and-run robbers and killers.

“It’s the Wild West,” said Wigginton, the U.S. attorney for the Southern District of Illinois.

Today, the murder rate in East St. Louis is 17 times higher than the national average, but financial problems have forced huge cuts to the police budget. The number of police patrolling the streets of East St. Louis was reduced by 33 percent between 2008 and 2011. Police in the city admit that they are outgunned and outmanned, but there is not much that can be done about it.
In Camden -
Camden, New Jersey is another city that has experienced huge cuts to the police budget. Their police force shrank by about a third between 2008 and 2011. Today, Camden is considered to be one of the most dangerous cities in America and it has a murder rate that is about ten times higher than New York City.

The gangs have a very strong hold over Camden, and kids kill kids on a regular basis in the city. The following is a brief excerpt from a recent article about the horrible violence that is plaguing Camden
And in finally, in the Presidents former hangout, Chicago -
In recent years there have been massive cuts to the police budget in Chicago due to financial difficulties. At the same time, gang activity has dramatically increased in the city.

As a result, Chicago has become known for murders and violence. The murder rate in Chicago was about 17 percent higher in 2012 than it was in 2011, and Chicago is now considered to be "the deadliest global city".

If you can believe it, the number of murders in Chicago during 2012 was roughly equivalent to the number of murders in the entire country of Japan during 2012.

And the primary reason for all of this violence in Chicago is the gangs. As I have written about previously, there are only about 200 police officers assigned to Chicago's Gang Enforcement Unit. It is their job to handle the estimated 100,000 gang members living in the city.

Approximately 80 percent of all murders and shootings in the city of Chicago are gang-related, and as the gangs continue to grow in size the violence in the city is going to get even worse. If Barack Obama wants to do something about violence in America, perhaps he should start with his home city. 

Prior economic activity which attracts unsavory elements. Check

Introduction of 'progressive/liberal' elements to modernize the city. Check.

Runaway 'economic success' that demonstrates the supreme wisdom of the progressives. Check.

Allegations of fudging, double books, and outright fraud resulting in witchunts and expulsion of more reputable citizens. Check.

Urban exodus. Check.

Precipitous drop in property value. Check.

Sudden, violent and 'unforseen' economic contraction. Check.

Further rigging of an already fraudulent system to compensate chosen vendors and corporate shills that utilizes the public treasury to backstop corporate activity. (Bailouts, business 'friendly') Check.

Mass urban exodus. Check.

Complete collapse into an unusable crime infested third-world gang land. Check and Done.

Let's review from the 2012 predictions -
Certain areas that were big on expansion before the crash, begin to resemble (Chinese) ghost towns. Eventually, gangs move into these areas abandoned by the local populace.

The cost of policing goes up substantially due to hazard pay, deaths and low enrollment. (Already starting to happen.) This leads to turf wars - (Black vs black, black vs Mexican, cop vs gang, cop vs Fed)

Of course, the reason why this is so completely and utterly predictable is because the arguments put out by proponents of these theories literally think they can rewrite the rules of physics, mathematics and human behavior every time and then deny they did it in the first place. It's like predicting a man will die when he falls from a few stories. Sure, he just might survive, but he will certainly be the exception and not the rule.

And yet the exhausted chorus rings out - We need worker retraining, educational subsidies, block grants, urban renewal, etc... all the while ignoring the one item that will definitely fix the immediate problem.

Property rights.

No, not coding and taxes. Flat out property rights. If you buy it, you own it.
Not renting via property taxes. Ownership.

In order to compete, we must first be competitive. (Seems simple eh?) And in order to be competitive we must have better than we currently have. And to have that, we must be able to trade and build without government intrusion.

Thursday, January 03, 2013

It's HIS Fault!

Happy 2013 to you all and let's get things started with a bang -
President Obama cut a video, distributed by his reelection, to reiterate his belief that the wealthiest Americans still aren’t paying their “fair share” of taxes and to outline a second-term agenda ranging from environmental policy to gun control.
Of course he feels it isn't.  It never, ever, ever will be. Just take a look at the fate of many 'progressive' nations from history or perhaps a few recent ones to understand that this is not a policy, not in the slightest. A policy would look something like this - 'The ideal rate of taxation is 35%. Less than that and we are not properly funded. More and we stall our economy.'

But this isn't designed to be a policy, it's a directive. More specifically a command to 'get the rich!'. 'They' did this to you, 'they' are responsible for your plight. Get them, squeeze them, humiliate them!

Eventually, one thing that becomes very revealing about 'progressives' is their stunning lack of definitions. Indeed, being a progressive often necessitates the ability to 'progress' (Read as change) a definition continually to get the desired result. For instance, just who are the rich? Are we talking about the 99%, the 1% or the .0001%? Ah, but you see, by not nailing down the subject of our ire, we're free to target anyone by simply redirecting the conversation. Which brings us to the truth of the matter, it's all about...power.

Hold that thought for a second as we look back to yesterday -
Theme : The year the world changed, for the worse. "That" guy is to blame. 

Like a bad divorce or a separating business, the business practices that were not only acceptable 10 years ago but commendable, become the 'I told you so' moments of the new age. People begin to turn on one another in droves as they need a raison d'etre for their pain, anguish and empty checkbooks. Surely they are not responsible in any way. It was THAT man, over there. He did this. He did this to us! And he must pay!
What's the official name for this? Class warfare. And right now the corpse of America is being picked apart for the spoils that are contained within utilizing this very technique. This is literally going on everywhere. In Congress  -
Upset over the number of days it has taken for lawmakers in Washington to act, Christie called the decision by GOP leadership to end its term without approving the $60.4 billion bill “disappointing and disgusting to watch.”
In South America -
In an emotional open letter to the British prime minister, Cristina Kirchner, Argentina’s president, has called on him to honour a United Nations resolution dating from 1965 and start negotiations about handing over the islands.
In the UK -
Downing Street said that the Prime Minister would “do everything to protect the interests of the Falkland Islanders”.

The source added: “The people of the Falklands have a clear desire to remain British and the Argentine government should respect their right to self-determination.”
I'm certain you get the idea. According to the paradigm, you are not even remotely capable of fixing, or improving, much less controlling your life. You have been victimized continually by forces unseen. It is part of why people are so edgy. The feel as though everyone is out to get them primarily because they are out to get everyone else.

You have a car? You don't deserve it.
You have a spouse? Surely you're abusing them somehow.
Got a job? You took it from someone who deserved it!

How?!? Who knows. This is part of why progressivism fails so miserably when it's allowed to mature. It literally cannot pay for itself. Consider the healthcare argument -

You have a 'right' to healthcare.

But how can this be? Healthcare is a service. One that's provided by another party at a cost to them. If there is an unlimited 'right' to it, the expense will likewise be equally unlimited. Human nature dictates that rather than be an open ended checkbook, most humans will quit healthcare and go into a more lucrative field thereby lowering the supply and raising the cost. So we see that a 'right' which creates a burden on someone else is no right at all as it creates an indentured servant.

Those in positions of power know this to be true, they realize that when you effectively utilize class warfare, you gain the power inherit with 'managing' the situation. More chaos = more power. This is why false flags exist and why true tragedies are followed with almost immediate calls to 'do something'. This power must be captured and harnessed by the 'virtuous' parties that will use the power for good, lest evil capture it.

This ultimately ends up being why definitions have to be so loose to the progressive. If things were more concrete, then the hypocrisy inherit in their position would become instantly recognizable to anyone who cared to look. Consider again the healthcare worker -

'If they have a right to healthcare, they will demand that right, from me. That in reality equals long hours, little pay and no appreciation. (It is a RIGHT after all) If I withhold it, it will be construed as theft and the services will be forcibly extracted.'

A law will rise that will dictate that a certain percentage of spending must go to healthcare, or else. But the infinite demand is more than the system can bear, so the parasite heads off looking for a new host. This is why these schemes inevitably become 'mandatory' for all as new blood is needed to prop up the failing system. Eventually, as the system faces collapse, the managers look for unwilling hosts to delay their eventual demise.

This is precisely why communism, socialism, progressive, etc always end up resorting to violence to further their aims. They have no standard, it is all relative judgments.

How do we know they are too rich? Because we are too poor, therefore they are 'not paying their fair share!'.

Make no mistake, once the 'rich' run out of cash, the sub-rich are next, then the middle-class, then the poor. Consuming like vile locusts all the way. And then, when we shall all be poor.

Monday, September 24, 2012

Identification and Papers Please

This raises the inevitable question of what is a violation of the fourth?
The Eleventh Circuit US Court of Appeals has ruled that private contractors operating toll roads on behalf of the state have the power to detain and store records on motorists who pay by cash at toll booths – another example of how using cash is increasingly being treated as a suspicious activity.

Having been held hostage by the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) and the private contractor in charge of the state’s toll road, Faneuil, Inc. at a toll booth last year for paying cash and refusing to have a report filled out on them and their vehicle, Joel, Deborah and Robert Chandler filed suit.

“Under FDOT policies in place at the time, motorists who paid with $50 bills, and occasionally even $5 bills, were not given permission to proceed until the toll collector filled out a “Bill Detection Report” with data about the motorist’s vehicle and details from his driver’s license. Many of those who chose to pay cash did so to avoid the privacy implications of installing a SunPass transponder that recorded their driving habits,” reports TheNewspaper.

“They were likewise unwilling to provide personal information to the toll collector, but they had no alternative because the toll barrier would not be raised without compliance. FDOT policy does not allow passengers to exit their vehicle, and backing up is illegal and usually impossible while other cars wait behind.”

The three-judge panel dismissed the suit, ruling that detaining motorists in order to record details about people who paid by cash was not a constitutional violation and that the state and the contractor could subject motorists to such treatment because, “In Florida, a person’s right and liberty to use a highway is not absolute.”
The problem with much of this line of thinking is that there is never a line of thinking that violates the 4th because we find end runs around them. I'm fairly certain that the argument on this one would be that it's not the state who's detaining the person, but a private company. No one ever addresses the issue - What's a private company doing detaining other private individuals? Of course the answer to that is that they are doing it at the behest of the state, which raises yet another question - How can the state confer powers that it does not possess?!? (The truth is, it cannot) Inevitably the answer comes back, it's policy and this is exactly the case in this situation. It is not state law that is detaining these people, it is policy

This allows both parties to simultaneously avoid blame and get exactly what they want that US Constitutional Law prohibits. Basically the reasoning goes like this -

Company (to private citizen) - We need you to voluntarily wave your 4th Amendment rights.
Citizen - I don't want to do that.
Company - But we need you to do it. (The company may have to comply under terms of its contract, but the citizen is not bound)
Citizen - Are you trying to tell me that I have to do this?
Company - The state does require it.(Implying that this is the law)
Citizen - Which law requires it? (An honest inquiry into the legitimacy of the law)
Company - Look, we don't want a scene, why are you causing a scene?!? (Now implying that the citizen, by exercising his rights is somehow violating the company's rights) We need you to step over here.
Citizen - WHAT? No way, I'm leaving.
Company - You can't. (Not true) In fact, we're calling the state to fix this.
(At this point the citizen falsely believes that the state will act in a judicious, third-party role. Boy is he wrong.)
State, LEO division (Arriving on scene) - What's the problem here?
Company - (Framing the situation) We just want to comply with you, wonderful state, but this guy is preventing us from doing it.
State (To citizen) - Why would you do this, just give the guy what he wants.
(At this point, the citizen is faced with a very difficult choice - Take the chance that this LEO will have half a brain in his head and enforce only the law thereby allowing him to continue OR face possible arrest, trial and imprisonment at the hands of a system that is only interested in getting what it wants.)

Day after day, this exact scenario plays out in airports, highways and other such places where there is interaction between these parties. And when an arrest does occur, typically the state points at the company stating that 'They can't control those renegade companies' and the company points at the state stating likewise. A judge, wanting to appear "TOUGH ON CRIME" sometimes throws these poor saps in jail over a non-existent crime, the shrill harpy women are all too happy to support a dynamic safety effort and the overall net-effect is that another tax payer becomes a tax consumer as he rots in a cell.

 Notes several other important points in this article:
  • The citizen is paying in cash. Something that until recently that was not only considered normal but necessary. 'Oh sure', they say, 'you can pay in cash, we just need you to comply with certain conditions.' (Which is also being driven by the state)
  •  Compliance is seen as being passed through. Data submission may be in-fact mandatory for the company, but the citizen is under no contract or law and thus not legally obligated to provide it. The judge in the case disagrees. Who's opinion counts? The judge.
  • This grants a corporation, the reserved power of detention that only the state possesses. This is the textbook definition of fascism.

And we wonder where we went wrong in this country?

Monday, January 30, 2012

Are We Responsible?

 We kicked off 2012 with the following -
Yearly Theme: Are we responsible for our own actions?
This question becomes the fundamental litmus test for most every action and decision in the future.
Following this, we move to the dictionary, that long forgotten instrument that standardizes communication among us lowly proles, that we might understand one another when we converse about, ya know, things.
Responsible -
adjective
1. answerable or accountable, as for something within one's power, control, or management (often followed by to or for ): He is responsible to the president for his decisions.
2.involving accountability or responsibility: a responsible position.
Policy -
noun
1. a definite course of action adopted for the sake of expediency, facility, etc.: We have a new company policy.
2. a course of action adopted and pursued by a government, ruler, political party, etc.: our nation's foreign policy.
Authority
noun.
1. the power to determine, adjudicate, or otherwise settle issues or disputes; jurisdiction; the right to control, command, or determine.
2. a power or right delegated or given; authorization: Who has the authority to grant permission?
And to explore these definitions, we move to our story -
Mustang Public Schools officials said a ninth-grader snapped a photo of a snoozing substitute with a cellphone last Friday at Mustang Mid-High School.The student was later suspended.
However, officials said, "A student may possess a telecommunication device while on school premises, but the use of a telecommunication device is not permitted during the school day."
The Real Effect
Let's begin by assuming a random person, Bob, exists. Bob, according to our Declaration of Independence and Constitution, is born with a certain set of rights. We'll identify them with letters, ABCD. Now simply by virtue of the fact the he exists, Bob possesses these rights.

For the sake of argument, Bob gets married to Jane and in doing so, he gives control of right "D" to Jane. This ownership is conditional upon the marriage and its validity. At this point, Bob has rights ABC but has subjected D to Jane. Bob might permanently or temporarily transfer these rights. For example, Bob has given control of his finances to Jane and in doing so Jane has authority over his finances. Why? Because Bob gave them to Jane.

So now Jane has ABCD + (Bob)D rights. But in gaining (Bob)D, she also gained (Bob)D responsibility. Put simply, Jane cannot resource pillage Bob's rights and then throw Bob to the side of the road because those  rights come with responsibilities. If she were to do this, she would rightly be reviled as a thief and fraud.

To cope with this, Jane then decides to implement a policy that states she can take all of Bob's money and ditch him. Does this have any bearing on her responsibility? No, of course not. Only Bob can release her of that and he has done no such thing. So Jane's personal policy that states it's ok to rob Bob is entirely irrelevant.

So returning to our original story, parents have given right "D" to a school to educate their children. They pay for this via taxation and as dutiful employers, have a right to a certain product. I think we can all assume that "sleeping" is not that product. So the recipient of one of these services, the student, documents poor performance utilizing his cell phone. In essence, the teacher is committing fraud against the parents and student.

When confronted with this information, the school blows the dust off it's policy book and states - Yes, you may possess a phone, but you may not use it. And since you used it, you broke our policy and we get to assess a penalty against you.

What?!? Should be the correct response to the school. Are you nuts? You caused the condition that required documentation (camera) to prove that you're robbing us! For you to attempt to preemptively punish us is abject lunacy!

One would think that this is the way people would think, but in this ever "complicated" (read as uninformed) world in which we live, the charlatans are running the show.

Prove things? They often scoff. We'll make it so hard for you to do that, you're stuck with us no matter WHAT we give you! And if you succeed, we'll ruin you.

And at this point, the problem and its symptoms come squarely into view.

Problem
Who is responsible?

Answer
Let's follow the chain....
Parents -> Government -> School -> Administrator -> Teacher

Ah, we see that the correct party is being held to the fire. In response to this, we have the school attempting to free itself from that responsibility. But a nasty little thing happens when you try to get away from responsibility, you lose your rights as ownership defaults to the last person to possess them.This in turn creates many symptoms which often become crisis.

Symptoms
Parents -  Why should we take our children to school, why should we pay taxes on a non service, why should we trust government AT ALL?

In failing to defend the parents rights, the school has destroyed the justification for its very existence.

Additionally, they have created a conflict of interest for the administrators. Just who do you support, the student or the teacher. After all, the policy says no using phones. And those teachers have it really hard. It is this conflict that turns a productive relationship into an unproductive one. This is demonstrated in the fact that the child is now less educated. Apply this out for a few generations and soon you have a system that takes money from one group and gives it to another for the sole purpose of existence. That is properly understood as a leech. And really, other then fish, who likes leeches?

Government should exist to enforce the ramifications of the contracts agreed upon. Not to draw up new ones itself or to direct policy. Quite frankly it should have no pony at this show.

Yet here we stand in 2012 and people just don't get it.
Real GDP increased 1.7 percent in 2011 (that is, from the 2010 annual level to the 2011 annual level), compared with an increase of 3.0 percent in 2010.
Got that? Growth is half of what it was last year and that's only because government is spending money like an 18 year old stripper. $52,409 is what each person "owes" the Federal government. But do they really owe this? The correct answer is yes and no. And therein is where people usually check out. 

You see the banks via the Federal Reserve have stolen rights, in the case of Bob, rights C and D and left us with A and B. Additionally, they dislike the responsibility that goes along with those rights. The government, our employees, cannot simultaneously claim that they are "in charge" or "leaders" while passing the bill to us. In doing so, they are seizing the power via fraud, spending the spoils on junk (lots of it), lying to you about the situation and when you finally find out, they try to imprison or kill you.

You do not owe fraudulent debt. Period. You did not incur that debt, they did. Many times in complete defiance of your stated wishes. They are rogue. They are usurpers. 
The correct way to deal with these ilk is to 1) Expose them 2) Arrest them 3) Try them and finally 4) Administer justice

Until we do this, we are just wasting time and resources.

Tuesday, November 08, 2011

Just How Did the Boomers Get So...Wealthy?

Class warfare is not my thing, but noticing trends is -
So far, today's young people aren't off to an encouraging start.

According to analysis by the Pew Research Center released Monday, younger Americans have been left behind as the oldest generation has seen wealth surge since the mid-1980s.

While it's typical for older generations to hold more wealth than younger ones who've had less time to save, the gap between the two age groups has widened rapidly.

In 1984, households headed by people age 65 and older were worth just 10 times the median net worth of households headed by people 35 and younger.

But now that gap has widened to 47-to-one, marking the largest wealth gap ever recorded between the two age groups.
The Real Effect
First thing's first. We shouldn't get too worked up about this sort of thing. After all, looking at "statistics" and trying to make things "fair" is part of how we got here. However, as we discussed in part in last year's The Prodigal Boomers, there is definitely a trend here of the Boomer generation sacrificing it's children to the fires of Molech.

Indeed, "Give it to me now!" has been the rallying cry for the last 40 years.

First, there was Free Love, a movement which sold out some of the rights of future husbands to carefree pleasure. (Result - STD explosions, AIDS and less secure nuclear families) Next we had the drug induced delirium of the 70's producing either the abortion nightmare or latch key/daycare kids of the 80s. Women abandoned child rearing in droves to 'find themselves'. (Not to mention millions of "single mothers".)

College was next as tuition became massively leveraged resulting in yearly exponential increases in college tuition.  Once out of college, good paying jobs were served up as unions demanded exponential increases of pensions, benefits and seniority. Want a job? Got to get it through us first!

As the 80s came into view, the stock market became all the rage as all this money had to go somewhere. Regulations and rules began to fall by the wayside as 'retire by 65 with my nest egg' took off. Some were even so brash as to want retirement by 55. Credit expansion ruled the day as leverage expanded massively in all sectors. (Spending their future earnings today) Corporate gifts abounded as deals are cut to 'promote growth' in all sectors. 'Corporate Crime' skyrockets.

As the 90s rolled around, Free Trade became the mantra fueling massive contracts that empowered overseas slave labor which led to the Big Box Retailers. Finally, rolling in the Millennium change, house flipping and wealth extraction via HELOCs and subprime loans allowed mass scale asset stripping to rule as Boomers took over companies, housing and all real wealth assets en mass. Gone were the days of affordable housing as now new individuals in the market had to compete with the massive power base of the Boomers continually shifting the rules to favor their class.

All of this leads to the crisis of 2008. Gen X, virtually abandoned since birth had since fended for themselves realizing that the game was long since rigged by many of their parents. Jobs had since been exported overseas. Many of their parents were now not only holding their own jobs, but many of the entry level jobs that young people would traditionally take. Housing had increased massively in cost as well as the regulations that are required to open a small business leaving the unconnected among them to scrape out an existence far below that of their predecessors. True, cheap goods had benefited them in part for a time, but now the loss of employment was far outstripping the benefits of cost reductions.

At this point, the market collapses, taking millions more jobs with it. Poor Gen Y is now hopelessly outclassed and seeks the only options it knows - college. Yet unknown to them, the leverage generated by these astronomically inflated tuition is one of the few things propping up the failing market place.

Social programs are enacted that place debt burdens via taxation on this upcoming generation. When that fails to secure the ponzi level growth needed to secure system stability, new "austerity" programs are enacted to forcibly extract all wealth from Gen X and Y. Yet the Boomers insist that they paid at one point in their lives, therefore they deserve - that our pensions be funded, our Medicare be paid for, our Social Security be paid for, etc, all on the backs of the upcoming generations who pay for it via value extraction via ZIRP and QE1 and QE2. TARP is enacted to ensure that Boomers can continue to see their "value" protected on their houses.

Left without employment and little voice at the table, Gen Y marches. #OWS begins.

Monday, October 24, 2011

Rome Wants a World Government, Surprise, Surprise

And people wonder why I don't trust the "Catholic" church very much -
The Vatican called on Monday for the establishment of a “global public authority” and a “central world bank” to rule over financial institutions that have become outdated and often ineffective in dealing fairly with crises. The document from the Vatican’s Justice and Peace department should please the “Occupy Wall Street” demonstrators and similar movements around the world who have protested against the economic downturn.

“Towards Reforming the International Financial and Monetary Systems in the Context of a Global Public Authority,” was at times very specific, calling, for example, for taxation measures on financial transactions. “The economic and financial crisis which the world is going through calls everyone, individuals and peoples, to examine in depth the principles and the cultural and moral values at the basis of social coexistence,” it said.

It condemned what it called “the idolatry of the market” as well as a “neo-liberal thinking” that it said looked exclusively at technical solutions to economic problems. “In fact, the crisis has revealed behaviours like selfishness, collective greed and hoarding of goods on a great scale,” it said, adding that world economics needed an “ethic of solidarity” among rich and poor nations.
The Real Effect
Perhaps the Vatican should pick up a few history books and see how well "Global Public Authorities" have worked over the last thousands of years. Recall my prediction from June of 2010 on the Religious Wars that I predicted which states (In part) -
For years, there has been clarion calls to "unify" under religion and while the somewhat vague calls of ending violence, war, and persecution are in themselves noble goals, mankind has demonstrated a penchant for doing the exact opposite of what he intends to do. History is replete with well meaning dictators that despite their best efforts, end up causing the very thing that were attempting to avoid in the first place through actions designed to prevent that very thing from happening.

"If only I could fix the world" is the rallying cry for many collegiate bound students and beauty pageant contestants. However, this assumes many erroneous things:

  1. That the "world" is "broken"
  2. That you possess sufficient knowledge to "fix" it
  3. That others will be willing participants in said "fix"
Of particular importance is also the move away from the one solution that has truly worked, free market capitalism, and closer to the insanity that brought us tens of millions of deaths in the last century. The problem is not that there is not enough "authority" to deal with these things, rather the problem is that the duly elected "authority", and I use that term with as much sarcasm as I can potentially muster, isn't doing a damn thing about the abuse. Creating yet another layer of "authority" (I would assume appointed, not elected) would only suck more life out of an already dying system.

Crises should be an opportunity to address the effectiveness of an already existing system and make subtle and accountable changes, NOT an excuse to whip up support for your pet projects and dreams of world domination. Further, given the less then friendly words spoken of the majority of believers and the church in the book of Revelation, I'd like to see the justification for any support moving closer to fulfillment of passages which include a church drunk on the blood of the martyrs whoring around with Satan!!!

Friday, October 21, 2011

Tying It All Together (For Tom And Others On The Right)

A piece by Denninger that is just far too good to pass up -


Ok, I'll be nice.
Once.
See, I'm a kinda-charitable guy, especially off-hours.  Besides, there's a whole lot of "Tea Party" and other "Right of Aisle" types that really need to hear this.
I may change minds here and I may not.  I ask only one thing: Read this with an open mind, then verify anything that doesn't sound right.  Do not trust my figures, verify them yourself.  Every source is cited.
It's July 2008.  You are a "TBTF" bank CEO.  You've been running a 30 year ponzi scheme using ever-increasing amounts of debt while GDP has languished in roughly the same place for the last two decades in terms of numerical growth.  In the 3rd Quarter of 2007, when the S&P 500 hits 1576 and the DOW tops, the economy put about six times the amount of debt into the system as there was GDP growth, and at that point GDP had started to roll over.  It had an obvious geometric progression look to it but only a few people in the blogosphere had been hollering about it.  You wondered how much longer it was going to be before the people woke up.
Over the next three quarters from the 3Q 2007 GDP has actually gone negative.  Debt demand has cratered and is down by almost 50%.  The handwriting is on the wall; credit creation is going to go negative too.

You have tens of trillions of dollars in credit instruments on and off your balance sheet and things are looking pretty bad.  You're getting pestered by people who see the credit contraction and start asking if you're good for those swaps, and the credit default swaps on your bank are blowing out.  They have a point too: If credit demand actually goes negative, you're dead.  You're geared at 30:1 which means you can only lose $3 out of every $100 of alleged "value" of your assets before you're broke.  The collateral calls alone on the more than $30 trillion in swaps are enough to kill your capital several times over should this occur.
See, that's the nature of a pyramid.  It all looks ok right up until demand starts to reverse.  Then it works in reverse, just like it did on the way up.  What made you $30 for every $1 of actual capital you had now loses $30 for every dollar of capital.  Attempting to fire-sale assets to avoid the disaster simply tells everyone in the market you're busted and they'll pile in short, destroying your stock price and further widening the CDS.  Too much of that and what you're trying to prevent will happen anyway.
Your morning includes one less coffee as you don't need any more jitters than you already have, and your evenings have an extra scotch or two before going to bed.
Then the phone rings.  It's one of your Vice-Presidents; he is responsible for, among other things, your repo desk.  One of your traders just came into his office and is as white as a ghost: Lehman has no collateral - they're bankrupt.
You collapse into your chair, dropping your coffee mug on the marble floor, which shatters into a hundred pieces.  If your repo desk knows this so does the NY Fed, headed by Tim Geithner.  That means Bernanke knows.  It also means every other firm on the street knows.  You look at the CDS for Lehman on your Bloomberg and shudder.
The very nightmare that has woken you almost nightly for six months has begun.
Note this well: It's July 31st 2008, or quite some time before anyone else outside of "TBTF" banks will know Lehman is about to fail.  Oh sure, there have been rumors since Bear went down, but that's all they've been.  Lehman's stock is trading at $17, and has been reasonably stable for a couple of weeks.  It was as low as $12 two weeks previous and looked like it was headed to zero, but then stabilized and recovered by almost 50%.  CNBC is chattering on a daily basis of rumors of all sorts but the market has actually been improving for a bit in tone.  The VIX, which was just shy of 31 two weeks ago, is now trading at 23.
You thought maybe - just maybe - it was going to be ok.
Now you know factually that it's not.
You call your equity desk and ask them to start quietly shorting Lehman's stock.  Not in size - you don't want anyone to figure out what's going on "outside" of those who already know.  You figure that everyone else in the TBTF club knows this too; there's no way they couldn't.  But you're cautious - while you know how much trouble you're in if credit demand doesn't turn around fast you also know that Fuld had dinner with Paulson in April - just three months ago and that there were rumors flying around that Paulson "loved" their capital raise.  It didn't make sense that in just three months they had no collateral for a routine overnight repo transaction!
The rest of the world will not know, of course, for a while yet that Lehman has effectively already detonated.  In fact for the entire next month the S&P 500 will actually trade up about ten points, from 1267 to 1277 in a choppy, directionless pattern.
During the next month credit demand doesn't move much.
Then "it" happens.  Lehman files.
Suddenly the collateral calls begin in earnest.  Credit demand takes another leg down and GDP prints negative.  You're now in the hole and there's no way out.  The only good news is that everyone else in the TBTF club is in there with you - hundreds of trillions of dollars of swaps, from interest rate to CDS to god-knows-what-else that was bespoke by this person or that, and they all want collateral as your credit condition is wildly deteriorating and your own CDS quote looks like the peak of Mt. Everest on the upside.  Your stock price is falling like a stone and the bond desk is telling you they're getting bid lists by the dozens from people trying to liquidate to save themselves but there are no bids at any price.
In the middle of all this you get called to Treasury for a meeting.  TARP has just passed and Hank and Ben want to talk with you and the rest of the TBTF CEOs.  You have your assistant call the hanger and get the jet ready.
When you arrive you figure you're being nationalized.  You're done and you know it.  There's nowhere for you to go; there's no bid at any price for some of your assets and for those where you can get a bid the loss will wipe you out.  You have CDS on some of your exposure but you're pretty sure the counterparties don't have the money -- after all, you know you can't cover everything you wrote if push comes to shove.  The simple fact is that an exponential contraction of credit demand into 30:1 leverage is not survivable.  You can protest all you want, but it doesn't matter; the math is going to win as the collateral calls will eventually chew up all your cash while the ratings agencies ratchet you down.  With only $3 of capital behind every $100 on your book there's just no way to make the math work, the bond market is effectively shuttered with the door bricked over and trying to raise equity capital into a crashing stock market is a fools game.  Even if you could get an offering off, which you can't, the interest rate on bonds would be north of 10% and the dilution on a stock offering would be hideous, never mind that you simply couldn't raise enough money going that route.  The bottom line is this: There's no way to make money when you have to borrow at that price, and all banks borrow in order to lend.
When you get to DC Hank and Ben are in the room and they're smiling.  You figure that the call to the board is going to end with you sending your assistant in to start boxing up your office, but when you all get there the mood is a bit different.  Oh sure, your TBTF buddies all think they're dead too, but once the door closes the real intent is disclosed.
  • The government's going to "give" you money.  It's not exactly a gift, but it's close.  The mechanics of this will look like a preferred stock purchase.  The reality is somewhat different.  Among other things with your CDS spreads in the stratosphere you can't issue bonds without paying 10% or higher interest rates, which instantly collapses the company.  But with an FDIC guarantee, which is being put on the table as part of the package, you will get the risk free rate of Treasuries, which are currently trading in the mid 3% area.  That's a huge savings - 5-6% a year in interest expense!  Suddenly the capital market door is open again!
  • Then Bernanke pipes up.  Provided you do this there won't be questions about your collateral, since you'll have the implicit backstop of the government.  This would go on to be worth over a trillion in direct loans; your "share" of it would wind up being nearly $100 billion, about 10% of your balance sheet, all at effectively zero interest.
You realize that what you feared - a call to announce that the regulators were seizing all of your firms as they all had no mathematical way to survive isn't what was going to happen at all!  Instead, you were going to be given some $250 billion between you and the FDIC was going to take all credit risk on your new bond issues for the next year.  In addition you were briefed on the TLGP which will guarantee your customers won't run your bank as it provides their demand accounts with unlimited FDIC insurance protection.  This is to be "free" for the first 30 days, and after that there'd be a fee, but compared to trying to keep your deposits and issue cheap debt it was for all intents and purposes zero cost.  Finally, Ben was going to let you have basically unlimited Fed credit at near-zero interest rates for the next year, meaning there would be no issue as to whether you could fund routine operations or not.
Your firm was being saved and the taxpayer was going to cover the risk - whether he liked it or not.
You were going to be asked to do a few things, however.  The public would never sit for being looted like this unless it looked like it was going to hurt a lot and there was simply "no alternative."  As it was Treasury and Bernanke were not sure that the public would buy it.  Congress already had bought off on it, effectively; after all, Ben and Hank had corralled them into a room and threatened them with martial law if they didn't pass TARP to begin with.  But it was important to make it look stringent, so there'd be no big bonuses until you paid the TARP money back and dividends would have to be cut to effectively zero.
All in you were getting a screaming deal.  Not only are you getting cheap capital, all things considered (the 5% preferred coupon with that FDIC backstop when your CDS spreads are being quoted in points up front literally saves your firm!) but the FDIC insurance on both senior debt issues and deposits - that is a pure windfall of unbelievable size.
You roll the numbers around in your head.  There is roughly $850 billion in deposits throughout the system that would be covered by the FDIC "unlimited" deposit insurance, and the majority of it was in your bank and that of your TBTF friends.  You figure that you and your buddies in the room could issue some $300 billion in "super insured" debt through the FDIC program and the surcharge from the FDIC is only 50 to 100 basis points; with the credit condition oncoming long rates will be headed southbound fast, so the odds are you'd see a 10 year in the 2.5% or so area soon.  That makes the deal damned attractive; you figure between you in the room this will easily save you $15 billion a year in the first-year financing costs (about 500 basis points on that $300 billion) or more than the coupon on the preferred stock!
It doesn't take long before the light comes on - this is a zero-cost option for you.  The capital costs a coupon on the preferred but the savings on the bond issues more than make up for it and the FDIC deposit insurance makes sure nobody runs your bank.
For all intents and purposes you're being paid to take the taxpayer's money!
When you walked in the room you were sure you were going to be nationalized - or at least expropriated in some fashion, as you were dead flat broke.  Now, well, let's just say that it's good to have friends in high places.
You wonder how the press is going to spin this one.  This finance stuff is pretty tough for mainstream reporters; so long as nobody noodles on the numbers they probably won't figure it out.  Never mind that the bonds won't all issue at once and most people will simply applaud the unlimited deposit insurance without thinking about the fact that it's essentially a gift - the 10 basis point fee (0.1%) is a bad joke.  $8 billion across the entirety of the system to provide unlimited coverage on $800 billion in deposits?  This much is certain: Nobody's going to be allowed to fail as that's wildly lower than the actual risk premium on that transaction.
What's not to like?
You walk out of Treasury with one of your friends from the TBTF bank down the street, yukking it up as you come down the stairs.  Who would have ever thought that such a heist would be possible?  Even better, the press reaction, especially from the right wing, can be counted on to get this wrong and claim that the government had stolen capitalism. That will give you cover for the fact that your firm was so far underwater when you walked into that room that you needed helium in your dive tanks lest you be narced out of your mind.
You will go on to pay record bonuses a year later, also paying back the TARP money.  Well, that which everyone saw anyway. The Auto industry is a different matter of course, and there were plenty of games played with AIG, which had written a lot of credit protection.  Had they blown you were dead, as they were the guarantor one way or another on far too much of your derivative stack.  But Geithner will claim at every opportunity that "TARP made a profit" and the public is too obsessed with American Idol to figure out that he's lying through his teeth.
But the real problem from a budget perspective, when all is said and done, was and is in Fannie and Freddie.  Although not really "TARP" funds their bailout was instrumental in preventing nearly all the 30:1 levered banks from blowing sky-high, not to mention pension funds and insurance companies, as everyone had a material amount of MBS on their balance sheets and had Fannie and Freddie defaulted it might have been enough to sink the TBTF banks all on its own and spiral the big insurers into the ground.  The discounted cash flow cost of not letting them blow up through 2009 was nearly $300 billion, of which $145 billion had already gone in through direct cash infusions.  This looked like "protecting the public", but it really was protecting the banks and insurers who were holding a crazy amount of MBS on their balance sheets and were able to unload them to The Fed during QE1 at a very nice profit, effectively screwing the taxpayer not only through the direct subsidy but also through the price-supported buyout in the QE program.  The exact amount effectively stolen from the people in this regard is hard to determine, but it is likely close to a half-trillion dollars in total including the direct and indirect costs.
Of course it got better from there too for the banks.  We now know from the Bloomberg lawsuit that there was in fact over a trillion in revolving credit doled out in the next few months to these firms, all at effectively zero interest rates since the overnight rate was for all intents and purposes zilch.  This too was a benefit, as the market price of credit is never zero, and that "benefit" continues to this day.  Tim Geithner, who had to know about the Lehman collateral problem in July of 08, would be rewarded for his part in all of this by being appointed Secretary of the Treasury.  And Paulson?  He got to keep his $500 million in Goldman stock and options when he took the original Treasury job, tax free.  He has not a care in the world.
Capitalism didn't die in 2008.  That's a convenient story, but it isn't true.  You can't expropriate a broke man or a broke business; there's nothing to take, even if you want to.
The truth is much simpler: The taxpayer was just plain robbed by the government and banks acting together.
If you think that $750 billion was a ridiculous subsidy to the TBTFs, or that they really didn't join with the government to steal from the public during 2008, the epilogue over the next three years went from ridiculous to stupefying.  From 2008 - 2010 we ran about $1,100 billion per year in additional deficits over the Bush years, for a total of $3.3 trillion.  This too was sold as "for the people" but that was a lie.  See, financial product credit (Z1 line Z1/Z1/LA794104005.Q) contracted from $17.1 trillion to $13.8 trillion today, or almost exactly the same $3.3 trillion.  Mortgages, during the same period, would contract by about $600 billion while non-financial business credit remained pretty-much flat and State and local borrowing expanded.  Put another way, the entire deficit addition over the previous multi-year baseline was literally given to the financial firms; the total amount of the taxpayer heist is over $3 trillion from 2008-2010, and as of the 2nd Quarter of 2011 we're still literally stealing from the taxpayer and handing it to the TBTF institutions via government deficit spending.

Ps: The worst part is that we didn't fix anything, especially the derivatives.  In fact, with the consolidation and "swallowing" of failed firms in 08 and 09 the risks now are higher than they were three years ago, and we're further down the road with the pyramid.  We stopped it from falling over temporarily, but only by shifting the debt accreation to the Federal Government and, to a lesser degree, on the backs of students.  If we do not voluntarily stop the nonsense, as I pointed out in the other Ticker, it will come crashing down anyway as we squandered our opportunity to force these jackals to either cover or tear up those contracts that cannot possibly be met in full.

Friday, October 14, 2011

...With Good Intentions

You would think these people would learn, eventually -
It’s a question many of us ask when we go out to a restaurant. “How much should I tip?” Whether your service is good or bad, San Francisco Restaurant workers want to implement a 25% standard tip onto your bill for you. Is this fair?

Many in the food industry say “…yes, it’s about time.” However, many “foodies” are not as happy with the idea. According to an article in the San Jose Mercury News, for the most part, people, on average tip between 15% – 20% and the restaurant worker actually has to claim 15% of that to the IRS.
Oh my, that's precious. But wait, it gets better -
Not everyone is against the idea. Some have felt with the state of the nation’s economy is in, that 25% is not unreasonable.
The Real Effect
Let's think that last line through for just a second. The reasoning goes something like this -

        People have less money in this Depression, so let's force them to spend more so they can have more.
<crickets chirping> Anyone??? Hellloooooo....

Brilliant. And this is what passes as "critical thinking" in today's circles. Sign me up and give me a $500k a year salary! Just think of the stimulative effect that will have!

All of these 'wonderful policies' start somewhere and this is usually where. The process goes like this:
  • Non-productive moron has idea about stealing someones productive money.
  • Moron speaks to city council, in secret
  • Family on city council tries to have "family help family" and passes a law.
  • Patrons stop attending tipping locations.
  • Moron along with non-morons lose jobs.
  • Moron has new, EVEN BETTER idea!!!! You want to hear it?!?

Wednesday, October 12, 2011

Police "Protecting" You, Despite Your Intentions

The thuggery continues -
BEVERLY (CBS) – Thieves are finding easy targets on the North Shore: Cars that aren’t locked with valuable items inside.

If your car door was unlocked, or an officer spotted your GPS, wallet, or something important in plain view, you might have found a warning on your windshield in Beverly this weekend.

Police were willing to stir-up a little proactive controversy to warn folks they were easy targets for some very busy thieves. Any car doors they found unlocked they opened up and locked themselves for the owner. They admit they did get some angry calls from drivers — who left their keys inside their unlocked cars.
The Real Effect
Of course the real egregious part of the story is the fact that they locked your doors despite you leaving them open!  You can't be trusted to make decisions on your own now lest something bad happen. The absolute arrogance of that move would have me chewing some detectives ear plain off.

Once again, this is all nothing new as The Real Effect covered this back in December in Canada.

Friday, October 07, 2011

The Fire, She Burns!!!

Consider just a few of the headlines occupying the interwebs at the moment:

Italy and Spain -
Fitch on Friday cut Italy's sovereign credit rating by one notch to A+ from AA-, saying the move reflected the worsening of the euro zone's debt crisis and an erosion of market confidence caused by the government's initially hesitant response to the rise in its bond yields.

The Euro -
Adding fuel to the fire is an errant comment from Merkel who has said that Eurobonds are "absolutely the wrong way to go", and lastly, a last minute notification from Fitch which goes for Trifecta by saying that Portugal remains on outlook negative, and the result is visible on the attached chart.
Dallas -

A protest that began with a few dozen demonstrators in New York City has grown to thousands in cities across the country, including Dallas.

As the group flooded Wall Street in New York for the 19th-straight day, about 200 people rallied at Occupy Dallas on Thursday.
Housing -
The American dream of homeownership has felt its biggest drop since the Great Depression, according to new 2010 census figures released Thursday.
Chicago -
It's sticker shock in the mail. Tax bills went out to Cook County homeowners this week and the big jump in the amount due to many homeowners has some wondering if they can keep their house.

According to the Cook County Clerk's office, tax rates are up for schools, park districts, municipalities and other government bodies. Some of those tax levies have made double-digit increases in tax rates.
The Real Effect

How do we fix this, easy to say, tough to do-
  1. Recognize the created order. (Skip this if you don't believe in it)
  2. Recognize and allow private parties to respect their property rights. (Gun rights. Legal rights)
  3. PROSECUTE AND IMPRISON the banksters. (Ones who have committed fraud)
  4. Repeal ALL property taxes. Repeal the Federal income tax. 
  5. Enact trade barriers that level the playing field with countries like China
  6. Enforce the borders.
  7. Remove ANY barriers at any level that hinder the growth of private prosperity. (Red tape)
Every time this has been done, be it America, Britain or Estonia the result has been a massive increase in living standards.

What happens if we don't do this? Where does this end up? In mass graves -
In a pediatric hospital in North Korea's most productive farming province, children lay two to a bed. All showed signs of severe malnutrition: skin infections, patchy hair, listless apathy.

It's also getting late for North Korea to get the massive amount of food aid it claims to need before the harsh winter sets in. The country's dysfunctional food-distribution system, rising global commodities prices and sanctions imposed over Pyongyang's nuclear and missile programs had contributed to what appears to be a hunger crisis in the North, even before devastating summer floods and typhoons compounded the emergency.
Government exists primarily to protect the rights of its citizens. If it is not performing these duties, what good is it? At that point, it takes on a role of not a protector but that of a prosecutor and enabler. Through its "rights" it funnels special privileges and "rights" to the class that enables it the most. One does not have to look very hard through the financial sector to discover just how nepotistic this is already.Of course, long time readers know this already -
The long and short is they are bleeding the real assets out of the United States and passing them into foreign control. Make no mistake, they will bleed this country dry. Savings, checking, 401K, gold, assets, they want it all and will not stop until they get it. The only companies that survive will be those that primarily serve the industrial military complex. Overnight this country will be transformed into the new prison state for the Global Order. Get food, get water, get a gun and get ready to defend yourself.