The prospect of another American civil war draws squarely into view -
Vice President Joe Biden revealed that President Barack Obama might use an executive order to deal with guns.
"The president is going to act," said Biden, giving some comments to the press before a meeting with victims of gun violence. "There are executives orders, there's executive action that can be taken. We haven't decided what that is yet. But we're compiling it all with the help of the attorney general and the rest of the cabinet members as well as legislative action that we believe is required."
Biden said that this is a moral issue and that "it's critically important that we act."
Biden talked also about taking responsible action. "As the president said, if you're actions result in only saving one life, they're worth taking. But I'm convinced we can affect the well-being of millions of Americans and take thousands of people out of harm's way if we act responsibly."
Biden, as he himself noted, helped write the Brady bill.
Eric Holder was scheduled to be at the meeting that's currently taking place at the White House.
Personally, I find it somewhat difficult to ever take Biden seriously. However the immense gravity of the situation demands that we do. There is no way that the administration would telegraph a move that could very well result in outright civil war unless they darned well planned on doing something. The fact that they chose to have Biden deliver the message is akin to making the joker of the group inform another individual of bad news. It is merely strategy in that if things go south quickly, you just burn the joker and pretend it never happened.
The most telling part about this though is not the action itself, it is the method by which they are considering (they're not actually considering, they've already decided) which itself undermines the legitimacy of the very argument they use to defuse the argument from the opposition!
What are the 'gun nuts' saying? "We need these to protect ourselves from an overzealous government!!"
The "grabbers" then make the arguments - "We're not trying to take the guns (Demonstrably false) and even if we did, you don't need them because the argument that we're going to be tyrants is wrong."
But as always, we measure not what people say, but rather what they do. And is this government even attempting to maintain a pretense of democracy, let alone our proper Republic? No, not in the slightest. We're going straight to tyranny. The King has decreed, therefore let it be so.
And the opposition wants to try to claim that the constitutionally biding side is nuts? No, you are liars and you have been exposed as such. Since it takes an amendment to change the rules, any continual support provided to these tyrants would be properly viewed as treason. (As was the case with support of the Patriot Act)
As if this wasn't enough, in what appears to be a coordinated move, all sides appear to be going for broke -
Retired Gen. Stanley McChrystal came out in favor of gun control restrictions in a Tuesday morning appearance on MSNBC's "Morning Joe."In New York -
"I spent a career carrying typically either a M16, and later a M4 carbine," he said. "And a M4 carbine fires a .223 caliber round, which is 5.56 millimeters, at about 3,000 feet per second. When it hits a human body, the effects are devastating. It's designed to do that. That's what our soldiers ought to carry."
Said McChrystal, "I personally don't think there's any need for that kind of weaponry on the streets and particularly around the schools in America. I believe that we've got to take a serious look -- I understand everybody's desire to have whatever they want -- but we have to protect our children and our police and we have to protect our population. And I think we have to take a very mature look at that."
A deal to give New York one of the toughest gun control laws in the nation is being negotiated by Gov. Andrew Cuomo, who, sources said Tuesday, is hoping to announce the plan Wednesday during his State of the State speech in Albany.Iowa -
In an interview with the Daily Times Herald in Caroll, Iowa, state Rep. Dan Muhlbauer said governments should start confiscating semi-automatic rifles and other firearms.Connecticut -
Muhlbauer, a Democrat from the western Iowa town of Manilla, is a cattleman and farmer. The newspaper reported that he owns a .410 shotgun, a .22 rifle and a .22 pistol.
“We cannot have big guns out here as far as the big guns that are out here, the semi-automatics and all of them,” Muhlbauer told the newspaper during a December 19 audiotaped interview. “We can’t have those running around out here. Those are not hunting weapons.”
U.S. Sen. Richard Blumenthal said he wants legislation that would require instant background checks for the sale of gun ammunition. He is expected to take up the proposal once Congress reconvenes.Of course, we should just trust that these individuals, who are often themselves armed to the teeth are going to just be nice -
"They can be done in 30 seconds," he said. "The vast majority are, and they would prevent people who should not have ammunition or firearms from actually buying it."
“I don’t care what the justification is that you’re allowed in this country to own a semi-automatic weapon – much less a handgun. But what do you need a semi-automatic weapon for? The only reason I think you’d need it is, Piers, challenge Alex Jones to a boxing match, show up with a semi-automatic that you got legally and pop him,” said Daily Beast sports columnist Buzz Bissinger.Got that? While interrupting someone is "undignified, unedifying.", threatening to kill them is just 'ha, ha...funny'. Of course the 'brights' get to decide which is which in our wonderful
No one should be surprised about this in the slightest though as it was thoroughly predictable -
Look for continued unrest with some governments getting overthrown. But as I indicated earlier, the globalists are literally banking on this to occur. We are still not there yet though. More riots need to take place, some shots, some new faces and then, we go to war.Let's spell this out in plain english:
The banksters have already stolen your purchasing power, your jobs, your retirement, your savings, and so much more and now, they need to get away. Far, far away. But they can't have you coming to retrieve their ill-gotten gains so they either use or cause scary events to create the narrative that YOU are the one that can't be trusted. No, you can't even get a job without being thoroughly vetted by the money makers and you certainly can't be trusted to own scary looking weapons.
That reminds me of a verse, I heard long, long ago...
And he causes all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads: And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.